Chain of Custody in Georgia DUI Blood-Test Cases

Answer:

Blood evidence is the strongest tool the government has to charge and potentially convict someone of DUI, since the law defines the offense in terms of blood alcohol content above .08 — breath tests, by comparison, rely on a mathematical formula to estimate that number. The chain of custody for a blood sample typically runs from the nurse who draws it, into a vial, shipped via FedEx to the GBI, where it’s stored and eventually tested months later. The government must prove the sample was truly yours, properly taken, and that each person who handled, packaged, opened, and tested it can be accounted for.

What “Chain of Custody” Actually Means

Chain of custody is the documented, unbroken record of everyone who collected, handled, transported, stored, and tested a piece of evidence. For a blood sample, that record starts the moment the vial is filled and has to account for every hand it passes through after that — the person who drew it, however it was packaged and shipped, who received it at the lab, how it was stored while awaiting testing, and who ultimately opened and analyzed it. The purpose is to give the court confidence that the sample tested is the same sample taken from you, untampered with and unaltered, from collection all the way to the result.

Why Blood Evidence Carries So Much Weight

Georgia is a per se DUI state, meaning a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or higher is legally sufficient for a DUI conviction on its own, regardless of how a driver appeared or performed on field sobriety tests. Because a blood number can carry that much weight by itself, it’s also the piece of evidence prosecutors lean on hardest — which makes any weakness in how that sample was handled correspondingly important to the defense.

Where the Chain Commonly Breaks

A break anywhere along this chain — at collection, during transport, in storage, or at the lab — gives the defense a concrete basis to challenge the reliability of the result. Common issues include:

  • Improper collection procedure or an unqualified person drawing the blood
  • Missing, incomplete, or inconsistent paperwork documenting who handled the sample and when
  • Gaps in how the sample was stored or transported, including temperature control
  • Delays or irregularities once the sample reached the lab for testing

What This Means for Your Case

Because the government has to be able to account for the sample at every step, any gap in that documentation is something a defense attorney can raise to challenge whether the result should be trusted at all. If you have questions about chain of custody in your case and you’re in the North Georgia area, give us a call.

Brett Willis Law LLC - Courtroom

5 Star Rating

Brett and his team were beyond supportive, helpful, gracious, caring and knowledgeable! We went through the most challenging and difficult time in our life and he was there every step of the way. With results we could never have imagined but definitely prayed for.

Not to mention his level of professionalism. From the first time we spoke to the first time we saw him in court. He stood out from almost every other attorney there. We were so appreciative that our attorney looked and was so professional, pulled together and prepared. When so many others were none of these things.

Thank you just doesn’t seem like enough to convey our feelings and appreciation.

Karen L.

5 Star Rating

I tried to write this several times and it brought me to tears. First may I say this has been the hardest three years of my life. Five lawyers I interviewed and none even understood the law as it applied to my case. So I thought I would try one more and it was Brett. From our first conversation together I knew he understood the law and was the perfect one for the case. I want to say how he prepared the case and presented it, achieving a full dismissal and ruling the police violated my first amendment rights. Complete genius!!!!

If you're reading this review and unsure, stop...call Brett. He always returned my call or texts within a couple hours, never more than 24 hours. He was always courteous and knowledgeable, trust me he talked me off the ledge a couple times. I would have given him 10 stars but 5 was the only option. Thank you Brett for all you did for me!!!!!

Donna R.

Harvard Law School

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Daily Report

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

National Criminal Defense College

Faculty

Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Justia Rating

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

SuperLawers

Rated by SuperLawers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

Harvard Law School

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Justia Rating

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Daily Report

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

National Criminal Defense College

Faculty

Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

SuperLawers

Rated by SuperLawers