What Should I Do after Being Arrested for Drug Possession?

Answer:

After a drug possession arrest in Georgia, four steps are critical. First, immediately and clearly invoke your right to an attorney — once you say “I want a lawyer,” law enforcement must stop all questioning. Second, do not speak about the facts of your arrest on jail phones. Every call is recorded and admissible in court; communication over jail lines should be limited strictly to arranging bond and asking family to help retain counsel. Third, retain an experienced criminal defense attorney as quickly as possible after release. Early retention is essential to preserve surveillance footage, body camera footage, and witness statements before they disappear, and to evaluate Fourth Amendment challenges to the legality of the search and seizure. Fourth, work with your attorney to understand the full procedural timeline — from arraignment through pretrial motions and, if necessary, trial. Even a first-offense felony drug charge in Georgia can result in years of probation, a permanent criminal record, and loss of professional licenses.

A drug possession arrest is a serious matter in Georgia. Even a first-offense felony drug charge can result in years of probation, a permanent criminal record, loss of professional licenses, and significant financial penalties. The actions taken in the hours and days immediately following an arrest can have a decisive impact on the outcome of a case. There are several critical steps every person should take—and several critical mistakes every person should avoid—after a drug possession arrest in Georgia.

Step One: Invoke Your Right to an Attorney Immediately

The single most important action to take after a drug possession arrest is to clearly and unambiguously invoke your right to an attorney. Under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section I of the Georgia Constitution, every person in police custody has the right to have an attorney present before and during any questioning.

The moment you request an attorney, law enforcement is legally required to cease all interrogation. The invocation does not need to be elaborate or formal. Saying “I want a lawyer” or “I am invoking my right to counsel” is sufficient. Once that request is made, any subsequent questioning by law enforcement conducted without counsel present is a constitutional violation, and statements obtained in violation of this right may be suppressed at trial.

Law enforcement officers are trained to develop rapport with suspects and to encourage explanations. After a drug arrest, officers frequently ask where the drugs came from, whether they belong to the suspect, or whether the suspect is willing to cooperate. No explanation, however seemingly reasonable, should be offered without counsel present. Statements made without an attorney—even statements that seem exculpatory—are regularly used against defendants at trial.

Step Two: Do Not Speak on Jail Phones

After booking, one of the most damaging mistakes a defendant can make is discussing the facts of the arrest on the jail’s telephone system. Every phone call made from a Georgia jail—with the exception of calls to attorneys on privileged lines—is recorded and retained. Prosecutors routinely review jail call recordings as part of case preparation, and statements made during these calls are admissible in court.

It is entirely natural for someone who has just been arrested to want to call family members, a partner, or a friend to explain what happened. This impulse must be resisted. Defendants have lost trials—including on serious charges—based solely on what they said on recorded jail calls. The appropriate communication through jail phones is limited to arranging bond, providing logistical information, and requesting that family or friends help retain an attorney. The facts of the arrest, the identity of any other individuals involved, the source of any substances, and any description of events surrounding the arrest should never be discussed on a recorded jail line.

Family members and friends who receive calls from a recently arrested individual should also understand this: if the person begins to describe the arrest or the underlying events, it is in their loved one’s best interest to stop the conversation immediately. Encouraging a detained person to tell the full story over a recorded line does them a serious disservice.

Step Three: Retain Defense Counsel as Soon as Possible

Once released on bond, the priority is retaining an experienced criminal defense attorney without delay. Early retention of counsel is critical for several reasons that directly affect the outcome of the case.

First, evidence must be preserved promptly. Surveillance footage from the location of the arrest, witness statements, body camera footage, and other evidence that could support the defense may be overwritten, discarded, or become unavailable within days or weeks of an arrest. An attorney who is retained early can issue preservation letters, file subpoenas, and take other steps to secure this evidence before it disappears.

Second, constitutional challenges must be evaluated at the earliest opportunity. Drug possession cases frequently turn on the legality of the search and seizure that produced the evidence. If law enforcement stopped the defendant without reasonable articulable suspicion, conducted a search without a warrant and without a valid exception to the warrant requirement, or obtained a warrant based on a defective affidavit, the drugs and any other evidence recovered may be subject to suppression under the Fourth Amendment. Once suppressed, the prosecution may have no viable case. Identifying and developing these arguments requires thorough review of police reports, body camera footage, and other records that defense counsel can begin gathering immediately upon retention.

Third, early communication with the prosecutor’s office—before charges are formally indicted—can sometimes influence charging decisions. In cases where the weight of the evidence or the circumstances of the arrest raise legitimate questions, experienced defense counsel may be able to engage with the DA’s office before indictment in ways that affect how the case is charged or whether it proceeds at all.

Step Four: Understand the Charges and the Timeline

After retaining counsel, it is important to understand the procedural timeline of a Georgia drug case. Following a felony drug arrest, the State has a limited time to indict the case or file an accusation. The case will proceed through arraignment, pretrial motions practice, potential grand jury presentation, and—if not resolved through a negotiated plea—eventual trial. Each stage presents strategic opportunities that experienced defense counsel can identify and pursue.

Understanding what is at stake and what defenses are available requires a thorough review of the specific facts of the case with an attorney. No two drug possession cases are identical, and the strength of the defense depends entirely on the circumstances of the search and arrest, the nature of the evidence, the credibility of the witnesses, and the specific statutory charges that have been or are likely to be filed.

Brett and his team were beyond supportive, helpful, gracious, caring and knowledgeable! We went through the most challenging and difficult time in our life and he was there every step of the way. With results we could never have imagined but definitely prayed for.

Not to mention his level of professionalism. From the first time we spoke to the first time we saw him in court. He stood out from almost every other attorney there. We were so appreciative that our attorney looked and was so professional, pulled together and prepared. When so many others were none of these things.

Thank you just doesn’t seem like enough to convey our feelings and appreciation.

Karen L.

I tried to write this several times and it brought me to tears. First may I say this has been the hardest three years of my life. Five lawyers I interviewed and none even understood the law as it applied to my case. So I thought I would try one more and it was Brett. From our first conversation together I knew he understood the law and was the perfect one for the case. I want to say how he prepared the case and presented it, achieving a full dismissal and ruling the police violated my first amendment rights. Complete genius!!!!

If you're reading this review and unsure, stop...call Brett. He always returned my call or texts within a couple hours, never more than 24 hours. He was always courteous and knowledgeable, trust me he talked me off the ledge a couple times. I would have given him 10 stars but 5 was the only option. Thank you Brett for all you did for me!!!!!

Donna R.

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

Faculty

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Rated by SuperLawers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

Faculty

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Rated by SuperLawers