What mistakes do police officers commonly make during DUI investigations?

Answer:
One of the most common mistakes is failing to consider alternative explanations for signs they interpret as impairment. If an officer smells alcohol at a car window, they often presume a DUI immediately, without exploring other possibilities — and that happens to people every day. If you’re in our area, give us a call and we’ll help.

Presuming Impairment the Moment Alcohol Is Detected

The odor of alcohol only tells an officer that alcohol was consumed at some point — it says nothing about how much, when, or whether it actually affected your ability to drive. Treating that smell as confirmation of impairment, rather than one data point among several, is exactly the shortcut that leads officers to skip the rest of the investigation they should be doing.

Treating Bloodshot Eyes as Proof of Drinking

Bloodshot or watery eyes are one of the most commonly cited “clues” in DUI reports, but they’re also one of the weakest. Allergies, fatigue, contact lenses, dry air, and simple exposure to bright headlights or a flashlight can all produce the same look. In fact, NHTSA’s own 1997 research report on detecting impairment specifically eliminated flushed faces and bloodshot eyes as validated cues, precisely because they’re open to subjective interpretation and commonly caused by things that have nothing to do with alcohol.

Reading Nervousness or Fatigue as Slurred Speech

Being pulled over is stressful, and stress affects how people talk. Mumbling, stumbling over words, or speaking too fast or too slow can just as easily come from nerves, exhaustion after a long day, or a preexisting speech pattern as from alcohol. An officer who logs “slurred speech” without considering the obvious alternative explanations is building a weaker observation than the report makes it sound.

Ignoring Physical Conditions During Field Sobriety Tests

The walk-and-turn and one-leg stand tests assume good balance, mobility, and coordination under stress — assumptions that don’t hold for everyone. Inner ear issues, old injuries, age, weight, uneven pavement, and poor footwear can all cause someone to fail these tests without any alcohol involved at all. An officer who doesn’t ask about any of that before scoring the test as “failed” is making a mistake that shows up in nearly every DUI report.

Relying on Memory Instead of the Video

Police reports are often written well after the stop, based on an officer’s recollection rather than a frame-by-frame review of the dashcam or bodycam footage. When the two don’t match — when the video shows steadier movement, clearer speech, or a calmer demeanor than the report describes — that gap is exactly where an investigation’s mistakes become visible.

What to Do Next

If you’re in our area, give us a call and we’ll help.

Brett Willis Law LLC - Courtroom

5 Star Rating

Brett and his team were beyond supportive, helpful, gracious, caring and knowledgeable! We went through the most challenging and difficult time in our life and he was there every step of the way. With results we could never have imagined but definitely prayed for.

Not to mention his level of professionalism. From the first time we spoke to the first time we saw him in court. He stood out from almost every other attorney there. We were so appreciative that our attorney looked and was so professional, pulled together and prepared. When so many others were none of these things.

Thank you just doesn’t seem like enough to convey our feelings and appreciation.

Karen L.

5 Star Rating

I tried to write this several times and it brought me to tears. First may I say this has been the hardest three years of my life. Five lawyers I interviewed and none even understood the law as it applied to my case. So I thought I would try one more and it was Brett. From our first conversation together I knew he understood the law and was the perfect one for the case. I want to say how he prepared the case and presented it, achieving a full dismissal and ruling the police violated my first amendment rights. Complete genius!!!!

If you're reading this review and unsure, stop...call Brett. He always returned my call or texts within a couple hours, never more than 24 hours. He was always courteous and knowledgeable, trust me he talked me off the ledge a couple times. I would have given him 10 stars but 5 was the only option. Thank you Brett for all you did for me!!!!!

Donna R.

Harvard Law School

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Daily Report

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

National Criminal Defense College

Faculty

Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Justia Rating

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

SuperLawers

Rated by SuperLawers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

Harvard Law School

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Justia Rating

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Daily Report

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

National Criminal Defense College

Faculty

Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

SuperLawers

Rated by SuperLawers