What evidence is most important in defending a violent crime case?

Answer:
The most important evidence usually goes toward proving you had no intention to harm the other person, or, alternatively, that the other person was the one threatening you, your property, your home, your vehicle, or someone else — in other words, that you were acting in self-defense. If you’re charged with a violent crime in the North Georgia area, give us a call and we can help.

The Two Central Defense Theories: No Intent or Justified Force

Most strong defenses in a violent crime case land in one of two places: evidence showing you never intended to hurt anyone, or evidence showing the force you used was justified because you or someone else was actually the one under threat. These aren’t mutually exclusive, and the specific facts of the incident usually determine which theory fits, or whether both come into play.

Georgia’s Self-Defense Framework Covers More Than Just Your Body

Georgia law doesn’t limit justified force to protecting yourself physically. Under O.C.G.A. § 16-3-21, you can use force to defend yourself or another person; under § 16-3-23, the same principle extends to defending your home; and under § 16-3-24, it extends to defending your property more broadly, including your vehicle. That’s exactly why evidence about what was happening to your home, your car, or someone standing next to you can be just as central to a case as evidence about a direct physical threat to you personally.

No Duty to Retreat

Georgia is a stand your ground state. Under O.C.G.A. § 16-3-23.1, there’s no legal obligation to retreat before using force in self-defense, even if a safe retreat was possible. That matters for how a case gets evaluated — the question isn’t whether you could have walked away, it’s whether your response was reasonable given what was actually happening.

Georgia Lets You Raise This Before Trial Even Happens

Unlike many states, Georgia allows a defendant to seek dismissal of the charges before trial ever starts. Under O.C.G.A. § 16-3-24.2, someone who used justified force is immune from prosecution, and the Georgia Supreme Court confirmed in Bunn v. State, 284 Ga. 410 (2008), that a defendant can file a pretrial motion asking the court to rule on immunity before the case proceeds. At that hearing, the defendant has to prove justification by a preponderance of the evidence — more likely than not — and if successful, the entire case is dismissed without a trial.

If It Goes to Trial Instead, the Burden Shifts

If the immunity motion isn’t filed or doesn’t succeed, self-defense can still be raised at trial, and the burden looks very different there. Once some evidence supporting self-defense is in front of the jury, the state has to disprove it beyond a reasonable doubt — a much heavier burden for the prosecution than the preponderance standard the defense faces at a pretrial hearing.

What to Do Next

If you’re charged with a violent crime in the North Georgia area, give us a call and we can help.

5 Star Rating

Brett and his team were beyond supportive, helpful, gracious, caring and knowledgeable! We went through the most challenging and difficult time in our life and he was there every step of the way. With results we could never have imagined but definitely prayed for.

Not to mention his level of professionalism. From the first time we spoke to the first time we saw him in court. He stood out from almost every other attorney there. We were so appreciative that our attorney looked and was so professional, pulled together and prepared. When so many others were none of these things.

Thank you just doesn’t seem like enough to convey our feelings and appreciation.

Karen L.

5 Star Rating

I tried to write this several times and it brought me to tears. First may I say this has been the hardest three years of my life. Five lawyers I interviewed and none even understood the law as it applied to my case. So I thought I would try one more and it was Brett. From our first conversation together I knew he understood the law and was the perfect one for the case. I want to say how he prepared the case and presented it, achieving a full dismissal and ruling the police violated my first amendment rights. Complete genius!!!!

If you're reading this review and unsure, stop...call Brett. He always returned my call or texts within a couple hours, never more than 24 hours. He was always courteous and knowledgeable, trust me he talked me off the ledge a couple times. I would have given him 10 stars but 5 was the only option. Thank you Brett for all you did for me!!!!!