Should I Talk to the Police without a Lawyer if I Was Arrested for Drugs?

No. If you have been arrested and charged with a drug offense in Georgia, you should not speak to law enforcement without your attorney present — under any circumstances. This is not a situation where context, cooperation, or a willingness to explain your side of the story will help you. In the vast majority of cases, it will make things worse.

You Have the Right to Remain Silent — Use It

The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees every person the right to remain silent and to refuse to answer questions that might incriminate them. This right exists precisely because the framers of the Constitution understood that the power of the government to investigate and prosecute is formidable, and that individuals need protection from being compelled to build the case against themselves.

When you are arrested for a drug offense, law enforcement will often attempt to question you — about where the drugs came from, who else was involved, where you have been, and what you were doing. These questions are not casual conversation. They are part of an investigation, and your answers will be recorded, documented, and potentially used against you at trial. Even answers that seem harmless or exculpatory can be used to undermine your credibility, establish your presence at a particular location, or connect you to other individuals or events the government is investigating.

Why Cooperation Without Counsel Is Dangerous

Many people in custody feel pressure to cooperate with police under the belief that doing so will demonstrate good faith, result in leniency, or help them get out of the situation more quickly. Law enforcement officers are trained negotiators who are legally permitted to use deception during interrogations — including telling a suspect that their co-defendant has already talked, that cooperation will result in a better deal, or that things will go easier if they are honest right now. None of these representations are binding, and none of them substitute for the advice and protection of an attorney.

Any promise of leniency in exchange for cooperation must come from a prosecutor and must be memorialized in a formal agreement. An arresting officer cannot make binding promises about what will happen to your case. Statements made without an attorney present, in reliance on informal assurances from law enforcement, are among the most damaging pieces of evidence that appear in drug prosecutions.

What to Do Instead

If you are arrested for a drug offense, clearly and calmly invoke your right to remain silent and your right to have an attorney present before answering any questions. You are not required to explain yourself, provide your account of events, or answer questions beyond identifying yourself as required by law. Once you have invoked your rights, law enforcement is required to stop questioning you until an attorney is present.

Contact a criminal defense attorney as quickly as possible. The earlier your attorney is involved, the better positioned you are — both to prevent statements from being made that could damage your case, and to begin building the defense from the ground up before the government has had the opportunity to solidify its case against you.

Brett and his team were beyond supportive, helpful, gracious, caring and knowledgeable! We went through the most challenging and difficult time in our life and he was there every step of the way. With results we could never have imagined but definitely prayed for.

Not to mention his level of professionalism. From the first time we spoke to the first time we saw him in court. He stood out from almost every other attorney there. We were so appreciative that our attorney looked and was so professional, pulled together and prepared. When so many others were none of these things.

Thank you just doesn’t seem like enough to convey our feelings and appreciation.

Karen L.

I tried to write this several times and it brought me to tears. First may I say this has been the hardest three years of my life. Five lawyers I interviewed and none even understood the law as it applied to my case. So I thought I would try one more and it was Brett. From our first conversation together I knew he understood the law and was the perfect one for the case. I want to say how he prepared the case and presented it, achieving a full dismissal and ruling the police violated my first amendment rights. Complete genius!!!!

If you're reading this review and unsure, stop...call Brett. He always returned my call or texts within a couple hours, never more than 24 hours. He was always courteous and knowledgeable, trust me he talked me off the ledge a couple times. I would have given him 10 stars but 5 was the only option. Thank you Brett for all you did for me!!!!!

Donna R.

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

Faculty

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Rated by SuperLawers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

Faculty

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Rated by SuperLawers