Should You Talk to Police If You’re Not Under Arrest? | GA

Answer:

You should never talk to police, regardless of whether they tell you that you’re under arrest, that you’re a target, or even that you’re flatly not a suspect. Police are legally permitted to mislead or lie to you, and it’s not uncommon for them to do exactly that — telling you they don’t think you did anything wrong just to get you talking. You are under no obligation to accept that invitation, and you should always refuse. Anytime police ask you to come in for a conversation, your first call should be to an attorney — us, if you’re in the North Georgia area, or a lawyer near you otherwise. Making that trip on your own is a mistake, and there’s a strong chance you won’t be walking out of that room afterward.

Why Police Are Allowed to Lie to You

This isn’t an exaggeration or a scare tactic — it’s settled law. Under the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1969 decision in Frazier v. Cupp, officers are permitted to use deceptive tactics during questioning, including falsely claiming to have evidence they don’t actually have, like fingerprints, DNA, or a witness’s statement, or saying that someone else has already confessed and implicated you. Courts have consistently upheld this practice as long as the deception doesn’t rise to the level of coercing an involuntary confession. In practice, that gives officers wide latitude to say almost anything to get someone talking.

Why “You’re Not a Suspect” Doesn’t Mean Anything

One of the most common — and most effective — tactics is simply telling someone they’re not a target, not in trouble, or just needed to “clear a few things up.” That framing is designed to lower your guard. Legally, it means nothing: an officer can say that and still be building a case against you the entire time. There’s no rule requiring them to warn you if their real intention is to develop evidence for a prosecution.

Why “Not Under Arrest” Doesn’t Protect You Either

Miranda warnings — the right to remain silent and to an attorney — are only legally required once you’re in custody and being interrogated. If police ask you to come in voluntarily for a “conversation,” they have no obligation to advise you of anything at all, because you’re technically free to leave. That’s exactly why so many people talk themselves into trouble during these “voluntary” interviews: they assume the absence of a formal arrest or a Miranda warning means the stakes are lower, when often the opposite is true.

Why Staying Silent Isn’t Automatically Enough

It’s also not enough to simply say nothing. Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Salinas v. Texas, staying silent during a voluntary, non-custodial conversation with police, without clearly stating that you’re invoking your right to remain silent, can actually be used against you at trial. That means the safest move isn’t just refusing to answer — it’s clearly and explicitly stating that you’re invoking your right to remain silent and want an attorney present, and then stopping.

What to Do If Police Contact You

Anytime police ask you to come in for a conversation, your first call should be to an attorney — us, if you’re in the North Georgia area, or a lawyer near you otherwise. Don’t go in alone, and don’t try to explain your side of the story before you’ve talked to someone who’s actually on your side.

Brett Willis Law LLC - Courtroom

5 Star Rating

Brett and his team were beyond supportive, helpful, gracious, caring and knowledgeable! We went through the most challenging and difficult time in our life and he was there every step of the way. With results we could never have imagined but definitely prayed for.

Not to mention his level of professionalism. From the first time we spoke to the first time we saw him in court. He stood out from almost every other attorney there. We were so appreciative that our attorney looked and was so professional, pulled together and prepared. When so many others were none of these things.

Thank you just doesn’t seem like enough to convey our feelings and appreciation.

Karen L.

5 Star Rating

I tried to write this several times and it brought me to tears. First may I say this has been the hardest three years of my life. Five lawyers I interviewed and none even understood the law as it applied to my case. So I thought I would try one more and it was Brett. From our first conversation together I knew he understood the law and was the perfect one for the case. I want to say how he prepared the case and presented it, achieving a full dismissal and ruling the police violated my first amendment rights. Complete genius!!!!

If you're reading this review and unsure, stop...call Brett. He always returned my call or texts within a couple hours, never more than 24 hours. He was always courteous and knowledgeable, trust me he talked me off the ledge a couple times. I would have given him 10 stars but 5 was the only option. Thank you Brett for all you did for me!!!!!

Donna R.

Harvard Law School

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Daily Report

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

National Criminal Defense College

Faculty

Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Justia Rating

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

SuperLawers

Rated by SuperLawers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

Harvard Law School

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Justia Rating

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Daily Report

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

National Criminal Defense College

Faculty

Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

SuperLawers

Rated by SuperLawers