Should I Just Plead Guilty to a Criminal Defense Matter?

Should I Just Plead Guilty to a Criminal Defense Matter?

Walking into court and entering a guilty plea to the charge as filed is always an option. But it is rarely the right one — and the assumption that doing so will result in leniency reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how the criminal justice system actually works.

The System Is Not Designed to Reward Capitulation

Many defendants believe that by immediately pleading guilty they are demonstrating responsibility, honesty, or cooperation — and that the system will somehow reward them for it. This belief is understandable but incorrect. The criminal justice system is an adversarial system. It is designed, at its core, for two sides to present their strongest cases and for a result to emerge from that contest. The system does not operate on the premise that voluntarily surrendering without a fight earns a reduced outcome.

A defendant who pleads guilty to the charge as filed, without any negotiation, without any defense having been mounted, and without any leverage having been developed, is simply accepting whatever the government has charged — including all of the penalties, all of the collateral consequences, and all of the long-term effects on their record — without testing whether those charges were properly brought or whether the evidence actually supports them.

The Best Results Come From the Best Defense

In the criminal justice system, outcomes are not distributed based on who cooperated most readily. They are the product of advocacy. A defendant who is represented by an experienced attorney who has thoroughly investigated the case, challenged the government’s evidence, filed appropriate pretrial motions, and negotiated from a position of strength will, in the vast majority of cases, achieve a better outcome than a defendant who did none of those things.

This does not mean every case should go to trial. Plea agreements are a legitimate and often beneficial component of the criminal justice process — but a plea agreement that serves the defendant’s interests is one that has been negotiated after the defense has been fully developed and the government understands it will have to work for its result. That is fundamentally different from walking in on day one and accepting whatever the prosecutor offers.

What You May Be Giving Up Without Knowing It

When a defendant pleads guilty without legal representation or without a thorough defense having been conducted, they may be waiving defenses they were never told they had. A traffic stop that lacked legal justification. A search that violated the Fourth Amendment. A chemical test that was improperly administered. A prior conviction that was constitutionally defective and could not have been used against them. An alibi that was never investigated. Each of these represents a potential path to a better outcome — a path that is closed permanently once a guilty plea is entered.

Before entering any plea in a criminal case, consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney. Understanding what the government can and cannot prove, and what defenses are available to you, is the only sound basis for making a decision about how to proceed.

Brett and his team were beyond supportive, helpful, gracious, caring and knowledgeable! We went through the most challenging and difficult time in our life and he was there every step of the way. With results we could never have imagined but definitely prayed for.

Not to mention his level of professionalism. From the first time we spoke to the first time we saw him in court. He stood out from almost every other attorney there. We were so appreciative that our attorney looked and was so professional, pulled together and prepared. When so many others were none of these things.

Thank you just doesn’t seem like enough to convey our feelings and appreciation.

Karen L.

I tried to write this several times and it brought me to tears. First may I say this has been the hardest three years of my life. Five lawyers I interviewed and none even understood the law as it applied to my case. So I thought I would try one more and it was Brett. From our first conversation together I knew he understood the law and was the perfect one for the case. I want to say how he prepared the case and presented it, achieving a full dismissal and ruling the police violated my first amendment rights. Complete genius!!!!

If you're reading this review and unsure, stop...call Brett. He always returned my call or texts within a couple hours, never more than 24 hours. He was always courteous and knowledgeable, trust me he talked me off the ledge a couple times. I would have given him 10 stars but 5 was the only option. Thank you Brett for all you did for me!!!!!

Donna R.

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

Faculty

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Rated by SuperLawers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

Faculty

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Rated by SuperLawers