Can a simple mistake at self-checkout result in criminal charges?

Answer:
A simple mistake while using self-checkout can easily result in shoplifting charges. As we all know, companies have tried to save money by making customers do a job they previously paid someone else to do. This has put real responsibility on you — you’re now expected to be a trained scanner. If you miss scanning something, the store may come over, charge you, and claim you did it on purpose. It’s not uncommon for someone to make an honest mistake while scanning their own items, only to be blamed for it by the retailer. If that’s your situation and you’re in the North Georgia area, give us a call — we can help you out.

Yes — But Intent Is the Legal Line

Georgia’s shoplifting statute, O.C.G.A. § 16-8-14, requires the “intent of appropriating merchandise… without paying for the same.” That’s not a technicality — it’s a required element the state actually has to prove. A genuine scanning mistake, without any intent to avoid paying, doesn’t meet that standard, even if a store treats it like it does.

What Georgia Law Actually Requires

Under § 16-8-14(a), theft by shoplifting covers concealing or taking possession of merchandise, altering price tags, switching labels between items, moving goods into a different container, or otherwise causing less than the full price to be paid — but every one of those has to be done with the specific intent of avoiding payment. An unscanned item sitting in your cart in plain view looks very different, legally, from an item hidden in a bag or a pocket.

Courts Have Thrown Out Weak Intent Cases Before

Georgia courts have made clear this element can’t be assumed. In In the Interest of E.B., 343 Ga. App. 823 (2017), a court found the evidence insufficient to support a shoplifting adjudication because there was no overt action showing intent — no concealment, no attempt to hide the item, no false claim of having already paid. And in Amosu v. State, decided in 2020, an appellate court reversed a conviction because the trial court’s jury instructions left out the intent element entirely, which relieved the state of its burden to actually prove it.

Why the Value of the Item Still Matters

If a charge does move forward, how it’s classified depends heavily on value. Under § 16-8-14(b), shoplifting involving $500 or less in merchandise is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 12 months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000. Above $500, it becomes a felony carrying one to ten years. Prior shoplifting convictions can also escalate the penalties on a later charge, even when the amount involved is small.

Stores Can Also Pursue a Separate Civil Claim

A criminal charge isn’t necessarily the only consequence. Under O.C.G.A. § 51-10-6, retailers have a separate civil remedy that lets them seek restitution and additional penalties from someone accused of shoplifting, apart from whatever happens with any criminal charge. That means a demand letter from the store’s legal department can show up even alongside, or instead of, a criminal case.

What to Do Next

If that’s your situation and you’re in the North Georgia area, give us a call — we can help you out.

Brett Willis Law LLC - Courtroom

5 Star Rating

Brett and his team were beyond supportive, helpful, gracious, caring and knowledgeable! We went through the most challenging and difficult time in our life and he was there every step of the way. With results we could never have imagined but definitely prayed for.

Not to mention his level of professionalism. From the first time we spoke to the first time we saw him in court. He stood out from almost every other attorney there. We were so appreciative that our attorney looked and was so professional, pulled together and prepared. When so many others were none of these things.

Thank you just doesn’t seem like enough to convey our feelings and appreciation.

Karen L.

5 Star Rating

I tried to write this several times and it brought me to tears. First may I say this has been the hardest three years of my life. Five lawyers I interviewed and none even understood the law as it applied to my case. So I thought I would try one more and it was Brett. From our first conversation together I knew he understood the law and was the perfect one for the case. I want to say how he prepared the case and presented it, achieving a full dismissal and ruling the police violated my first amendment rights. Complete genius!!!!

If you're reading this review and unsure, stop...call Brett. He always returned my call or texts within a couple hours, never more than 24 hours. He was always courteous and knowledgeable, trust me he talked me off the ledge a couple times. I would have given him 10 stars but 5 was the only option. Thank you Brett for all you did for me!!!!!

Donna R.

Harvard Law School

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Daily Report

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

National Criminal Defense College

Faculty

Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Justia Rating

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

SuperLawers

Rated by SuperLawers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

Harvard Law School

Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Instructor

Justia Rating

Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating

Daily Report

10 Lawyers You Need to Know

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers


Brett M. Willis Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney

Avvo Rating 10

National Criminal Defense College

Faculty

Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

Faculty, Bill Daniel Trial Advocacy Program

SuperLawers

Rated by SuperLawers